Yexin Ma vs Olivia Lincer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Efficiency: Lincer has secured 32.14% of their second serve points, while Ma stands at 37.18%. Could Ma's superior performance here be a deciding factor?
• Return Game Supremacy: Lincer's return game sees them winning 39.45% on opponents' second serves, compared to Ma's 48.8%. In first serve return points, Lincer has 30.7%, slightly trailing Ma's 31.68%.
• Break Point Resilience: Under pressure, Lincer saves 43.4% of breakpoints, whereas Ma boasts a higher 48.91%. This could be pivotal in high-stakes moments.
• Winning Consistency: Over the past year, Lincer has taken 69.23% of matches, outperforming Ma's 50% win rate.
• Surface Preference: Lincer shines on Hard with a 62% win rate, while Ma prefers Clay, winning 56% of the time.
• Event Level Experience: Lincer has excelled in Challenger/ITF tournaments with a 69.44% success rate, slightly above Ma's 53.85% in similar events.
• Direct Match History: Ma leads the head-to-head, having won their only meeting decisively in straight sets.
• Competitiveness of Matches: Their average match duration is 1:13:0, with no deciding sets or tiebreaks meeting between them.
• Quality of Opponents: Lincer's average opponent is ranked 464.08, while Ma faces more formidable challenges with an average rank of 344.35.
• Clutch Performance: In deciding sets over the last year, Lincer prevails 62% of the time, compared to Ma's 43%.
• Breakpoint Conversion: Lincer's conversion is 26.67%, yet Ma excels with 36.57%, suggesting more efficacy in critical points.

Editorial Prediction (June 19, 2025, UTC):

Recent performance indicators show that Ma has a notable edge in several key areas, including second serve points won and the return game. Performance under pressure also favors Ma, as reflected in a higher breakpoint save percentage.

Furthermore, the only previous encounter between these two saw Ma winning convincingly, which might bolster their confidence. Also, Ma's ability to convert breakpoints suggests a tactical advantage.

Lincer, however, has shown a stronger consistency in winning matches across the board and demonstrates a slight advantage in deciding sets, but the relatively lower quality of opponents compared to Ma could be a consideration.

Given these factors, while Lincer presents a strong challenge, Ma seems slightly more equipped to win this upcoming match unless conditions shift significantly in Lincer's favor.